Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Doyle

645 N.E.2d 1244, 71 Ohio St. 3d 574, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 506
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 1, 1995·No. No. 94-1839·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Doyle, 645 N.E.2d 1244, 71 Ohio St. 3d 574, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 506 (Ohio 1995).

645 N.E.2d 1244 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Doyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Ewing
1996 Ohio 317 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)