Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge

597 N.E.2d 164, 64 Ohio St. 3d 1212, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 2000

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 4, 1992

DocketNo. 89-2212

StatusPublished

This text of 597 N.E.2d 164 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge, 597 N.E.2d 164, 64 Ohio St. 3d 1212, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 2000 (Ohio 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

On Application for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, James C. Dodge, Registration No. 0000649.

[1213]*1213The court coming now to consider its order of June 27, 1990, suspending respondent, James C. Dodge, from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of two years pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(c) (now Section 6[B][3]), finds that respondent has substantially complied with this order, and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A) (formerly Section 24). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that James C. Dodge be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1).

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 132, 556 N.E.2d 1147.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI