Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge

512 N.E.2d 650, 32 Ohio St. 3d 118, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 353
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 19, 1987·No. D.D. No. 87-6·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. The evidence presented illustrates that respondent, while the victim of uncontrolled alcoholism, did misuse client remuneration illegally and in a fashion which severely compromised client trust.

Accordingly, this court adopts the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years, one year of which is suspended. In addition, respondent is hereby placed on probation to last five years from the date of this decision during which time respondent must make restitution, abstain from the use of beverage alcohol, and remain an active member of Alcoholics Anonymous. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyek, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge, 512 N.E.2d 650, 32 Ohio St. 3d 118, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 353 (Ohio 1987).

512 N.E.2d 650 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge
744 N.E.2d 1191 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Dodge
2001 Ohio 60 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Gill
528 N.E.2d 945 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)