Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeRenzo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeRenzo

699 A.2d 709

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 15, 1997

DocketNo. 355 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 699 A.2d 709 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeRenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeRenzo, 699 A.2d 709 (Pa. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 1997, an Order and Rule to Show Cause having been entered by this Court on June 20, 1997, and no response to the Rule to Show Cause having been filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Rule is made absolute and, pursuant to Rule 208(f), Pa.R.D.E., respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.;

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, in accordance with Rule 217(g), Pa.R.D.E., shall take such further action and make such further orders as may be necessary to fully protect the rights and interests of respondent’s clients.

4. All financial institutions in which respondent holds accounts shall freeze such accounts pending further Order of this Court.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI