Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietro

643 N.E.2d 1145, 71 Ohio St. 3d 391
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 30, 1994
DocketNo. 94-2253
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 643 N.E.2d 1145 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietro, 643 N.E.2d 1145, 71 Ohio St. 3d 391 (Ohio 1994).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand Harry J. DePietro. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Siewert
2011 Ohio 5935 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Schmalz
2009 Ohio 4159 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Kodish
110 Ohio St. 3d 162 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Engler
851 N.E.2d 502 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Moore
804 N.E.2d 423 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)
In Re Ashy
721 So. 2d 859 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
643 N.E.2d 1145, 71 Ohio St. 3d 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-depietro-ohio-1994.