Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietro

643 N.E.2d 1145, 71 Ohio St. 3d 391
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 1994·No. No. 94-2253·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand Harry J. DePietro. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietro, 643 N.E.2d 1145, 71 Ohio St. 3d 391 (Ohio 1994).

643 N.E.2d 1145 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Siewert
2011 Ohio 5935 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Schmalz
2009 Ohio 4159 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Kodish
110 Ohio St. 3d 162 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Engler
851 N.E.2d 502 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Moore
804 N.E.2d 423 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)
In Re Ashy
721 So. 2d 859 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1998)