Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Davis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Davis

667 A.2d 13

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 22, 1995

DocketNo. 837 Disciplinary Docket No. 2; Disciplinary Board No. 89 DB 92

StatusPublished

This text of 667 A.2d 13 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Davis, 667 A.2d 13 (Pa. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 19,1994, and following oral argument, it is hereby

ORDERED that respondent be and he is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Mr. Justice Montemuro participates by designation as a senior judge as provided by Pa.R.JA. No. 701(f).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 19,1994, and following oral argument, it is hereby

ORDERED that respondent be and he is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Mr. Justice Montemuro participates by designation as a senior judge as provided by Pa.R.JA. No. 701(f).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 A.2d 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-davis-pa-1995.