Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Davis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Davis

667 A.2d 13

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 22, 1995·No. No. 837 Disciplinary Docket No. 2; Disciplinary Board No. 89 DB 92·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 19,1994, and following oral argument, it is hereby

ORDERED that respondent be and he is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Mr. Justice Montemuro participates by designation as a senior judge as provided by Pa.R.JA. No. 701(f).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 19,1994, and following oral argument, it is hereby

ORDERED that respondent be and he is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Mr. Justice Montemuro participates by designation as a senior judge as provided by Pa.R.JA. No. 701(f).

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Davis, 667 A.2d 13 (Pa. 1995).

Pincite

667 A.2d 13 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.