Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crum

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crum

891 A.2d 724

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 7, 2006

DocketNo. 1108 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 891 A.2d 724 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crum, 891 A.2d 724 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2006, there having been filed with this Court by Lee E. Crum his verified Statement of Resignation dated November 30, 2005, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Lee E. Crum be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Former Justice Nigro did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of February, 2006, there having been filed with this Court by Lee E. Crum his verified Statement of Resignation dated November 30, 2005, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Lee E. Crum be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Former Justice Nigro did not participate in this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

891 A.2d 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-crum-pa-2006.