Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Criden

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Criden

727 A.2d 119

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 24, 1999

DocketNo. 482 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 727 A.2d 119 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Criden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Criden, 727 A.2d 119 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 1999, upon consideration of the Report and Recom[120]*120mendations of the Disciplinary Board dated December 1,1998, it is hereby

ORDERED that LOUIS S. CRIDEN be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of four (4) years to run consecutively to the period of suspension previously imposed by this Court on August 2, 1994, at No. 145 DB 91, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justices CASTILLE and NIGRO dissent and would enter a rule upon respondent to show cause why he should not be disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI