Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Criden

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Criden

645 A.2d 1286

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 2, 1994

DocketNo. 52 Disciplinary Docket No. 3; Disciplinary Board No. 145 DB 91

StatusPublished

This text of 645 A.2d 1286 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Criden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Criden, 645 A.2d 1286 (Pa. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 1994, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 14, 1994, it is hereby

ORDERED that Louis S. Criden be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three (3) years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

CAPPY, J., dissents and would adopt the recommendation of the Hearing Committee and the Disciplinary Board that respondent be suspended for two years. MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1801, due to the unavailability of LARSEN, J., see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 1994, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 14, 1994, it is hereby

ORDERED that Louis S. Criden be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three (3) years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

CAPPY, J., dissents and would adopt the recommendation of the Hearing Committee and the Disciplinary Board that respondent be suspended for two years. MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1801, due to the unavailability of LARSEN, J., see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

645 A.2d 1286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-criden-pa-1994.