Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crane

564 N.E.2d 96, 56 Ohio St. 3d 38, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1711

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We find respondent’s conduct to be a violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) and (5) and concur in the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, without credit for the time already suspended. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.