Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crane

564 N.E.2d 96, 56 Ohio St. 3d 38, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1711
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 12, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1555
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 564 N.E.2d 96 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crane, 564 N.E.2d 96, 56 Ohio St. 3d 38, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1711 (Ohio 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We find respondent’s conduct to be a violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) and (5) and concur in the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, without credit for the time already suspended. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Warner
2024 Ohio 551 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2024)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Hunter
2023 Ohio 4168 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2023)
Ohio State Bar Association v. McCafferty
2014 Ohio 3075 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 N.E.2d 96, 56 Ohio St. 3d 38, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-crane-ohio-1990.