Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova
615 N.E.2d 1035, 67 Ohio St. 3d 25
This text of 615 N.E.2d 1035 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova, 615 N.E.2d 1035, 67 Ohio St. 3d 25 (Ohio 1993).
Opinions
We concur in the findings of misconduct by the board. However, we differ with the board’s recommendation. We order instead that respondent be publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Speros
1995 Ohio 205 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Speros
652 N.E.2d 681 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
615 N.E.2d 1035, 67 Ohio St. 3d 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-cordova-ohio-1993.