Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Confair

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Confair

713 A.2d 632

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 7, 1998

DocketNo. 441 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 713 A.2d 632 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Confair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Confair, 713 A.2d 632 (Pa. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 1998, upon consideration of the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board dated June 9, 1998, it is hereby

ORDERED that Richard James Confair is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f), Pa.R.D.E., until further definitive action by this Court. It is further ORDERED that respondent sháll comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 1998, upon consideration of the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board dated June 9, 1998, it is hereby

ORDERED that Richard James Confair is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f), Pa.R.D.E., until further definitive action by this Court. It is further ORDERED that respondent sháll comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

713 A.2d 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-confair-pa-1998.