Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Collins
This text of 476 N.E.2d 1050 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No objections to the board’s findings and recommendations were filed by the Disciplinary Counsel or respondent. Respondent’s conduct, which resulted in a felony conviction, cannot be lightly regarded by this court in its quest to maintain high ethical standards for the members of Ohio’s Bar. Upon a review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings and recommendation that respondent be indefinitely suspended.
[43]*43We also agree with the board’s determination that respondent’s request for reinstatement from his current automatic indefinite suspension does not comply with the requirements of Gov. Bar R. V(23) to (25).
This court finds that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and (4). It is hereby the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
476 N.E.2d 1050, 17 Ohio St. 3d 41, 17 Ohio B. 34, 1985 Ohio LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-collins-ohio-1985.