Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane

642 N.E.2d 343, 71 Ohio St. 3d 97
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 7, 1994·No. No. 94-1763·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent has failed to show cause why he should not receive discipline comparable to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Nevada. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane, 642 N.E.2d 343, 71 Ohio St. 3d 97 (Ohio 1994).

642 N.E.2d 343 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ross
1998 Ohio 442 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane
1994 Ohio 10 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)