Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Christ

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Christ

658 N.E.2d 746, 74 Ohio St. 3d 308
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 17, 1996·No. No. 95-1670·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s finding of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 9-101(A). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Christ, 658 N.E.2d 746, 74 Ohio St. 3d 308 (Ohio 1996).

658 N.E.2d 746 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Christ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Runyan
840 N.E.2d 623 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Christ
1996 Ohio 72 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)