Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Christ
658 N.E.2d 746, 74 Ohio St. 3d 308
This text of 658 N.E.2d 746 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Christ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Christ, 658 N.E.2d 746, 74 Ohio St. 3d 308 (Ohio 1996).
Opinion
Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s finding of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 9-101(A). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Disciplinary Counsel v. Runyan
840 N.E.2d 623 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Christ
1996 Ohio 72 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
658 N.E.2d 746, 74 Ohio St. 3d 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-christ-ohio-1996.