Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood

546 N.E.2d 411, 46 Ohio St. 3d 186, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 282
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1989·No. No. 89-1093·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years but stay the suspension pending his successful completion of two years of monitored probation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood, 546 N.E.2d 411, 46 Ohio St. 3d 186, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 282 (Ohio 1989).

546 N.E.2d 411 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood
1996 Ohio 294 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Caywood
1994 Ohio 98 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood
609 N.E.2d 561 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)