Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood

546 N.E.2d 411, 46 Ohio St. 3d 186, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 282
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1989
DocketNo. 89-1093
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 546 N.E.2d 411 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood, 546 N.E.2d 411, 46 Ohio St. 3d 186, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 282 (Ohio 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years but stay the suspension pending his successful completion of two years of monitored probation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood
1996 Ohio 294 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Caywood
1994 Ohio 98 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Caywood
609 N.E.2d 561 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
546 N.E.2d 411, 46 Ohio St. 3d 186, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-caywood-ohio-1989.