Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Carter

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Carter

629 N.E.2d 430, 68 Ohio St. 3d 568
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 30, 1994
DocketNo. 93-2177
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 629 N.E.2d 430 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Carter, 629 N.E.2d 430, 68 Ohio St. 3d 568 (Ohio 1994).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent committed the disciplinary violations found by the board. We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of two years. The sanction is suspended and respondent is placed on probation for two years, under the conditions recommended by the board. If respondent violates any of those conditions during the probationary period, the two-year term of suspension will be automatically imposed. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Akron Bar Assn. v. Meyer
1999 Ohio 3 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado
1996 Ohio 295 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fortado
660 N.E.2d 1154 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
629 N.E.2d 430, 68 Ohio St. 3d 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-carter-ohio-1994.