Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Capers

472 N.E.2d 1073, 15 Ohio St. 3d 122, 15 Ohio B. 273, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1276
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 31, 1984·No. D.D. No. 84-4·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Upon careful review and consideration of the evidence, this court concurs in the finding of the board that respondent violated Canon 7A(1)(b) of the Code of Judicial Conduct, and concurs in the recommendation that respondent be given a public reprimand.

Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that respondent be given a public reprimand.

Judgment accordingly.

W. Brown, Sweeney, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., dissents. Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent separately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Capers, 472 N.E.2d 1073, 15 Ohio St. 3d 122, 15 Ohio B. 273, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1276 (Ohio 1984).

472 N.E.2d 1073 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Capers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of William A. Vincent, Jr.
2007 NMSC 056 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 2007)
Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Reid
1999 Ohio 374 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
In Re Steady
641 A.2d 117 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1994)
In Re Code of Jud. Conduct
603 So. 2d 494 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)