Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bussinger

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bussinger

541 N.E.2d 609, 44 Ohio St. 3d 145, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 160
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 26, 1989
DocketNo. 89-659
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 541 N.E.2d 609 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bussinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bussinger, 541 N.E.2d 609, 44 Ohio St. 3d 145, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 160 (Ohio 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bussinger
1997 Ohio 102 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bussinger
643 N.E.2d 137 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
In re Corrigan
546 N.E.2d 1315 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
541 N.E.2d 609, 44 Ohio St. 3d 145, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-bussinger-ohio-1989.