Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart

675 N.E.2d 5, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1266, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 443

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 24, 1997

DocketNo. 95-1196

StatusPublished

This text of 675 N.E.2d 5 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart, 675 N.E.2d 5, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1266, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 443 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement on November 1, 1996, by respondent, Gladys F. Burkhart, Attorney Registration No. 0022735, last known address in Crestline, Ohio.

The court comes now to consider its order of March 5,1996, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with credit for the suspension of her license on November 12,1993, in In re Burkhart (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 1499, 622 N.E.2d 648, and further ordered that prior to her reinstatement she must make restitution and complete her probation, and in no case be reinstated prior to November 1, 1996. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that Gladys F. Burkhart be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 188, 661 N.E.2d 1062.

Mover, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement on November 1, 1996, by respondent, Gladys F. Burkhart, Attorney Registration No. 0022735, last known address in Crestline, Ohio.

The court comes now to consider its order of March 5,1996, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with credit for the suspension of her license on November 12,1993, in In re Burkhart (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 1499, 622 N.E.2d 648, and further ordered that prior to her reinstatement she must make restitution and complete her probation, and in no case be reinstated prior to November 1, 1996. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that Gladys F. Burkhart be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 188, 661 N.E.2d 1062.

Mover, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

675 N.E.2d 5, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1266, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-burkhart-ohio-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack