Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart

581 N.E.2d 540, 62 Ohio St. 3d 252, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2884
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 18, 1991
DocketNo. 91-1769
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 581 N.E.2d 540 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart, 581 N.E.2d 540, 62 Ohio St. 3d 252, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2884 (Ohio 1991).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Pyle, Unpublished Decision (11-18-2004)
2004 Ohio 6201 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
581 N.E.2d 540, 62 Ohio St. 3d 252, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-burkhart-ohio-1991.