Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart

581 N.E.2d 540, 62 Ohio St. 3d 252, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2884
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 18, 1991·No. No. 91-1769·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart, 581 N.E.2d 540, 62 Ohio St. 3d 252, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2884 (Ohio 1991).

581 N.E.2d 540 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Pyle, Unpublished Decision (11-18-2004)
2004 Ohio 6201 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)