Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

660 N.E.2d 1147, 74 Ohio St. 3d 594
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2124
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 660 N.E.2d 1147 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown, 660 N.E.2d 1147, 74 Ohio St. 3d 594 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings of misconduct and recommendation of the board. Respondent, Perry Lowell Brown, is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, with any petition for reinstatement conditioned upon complete restitution to the Eaton National Bank and Trust Co. and reimbursement to respondent’s grandparents for all monies borrowed to make restitution. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Resnick, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent and would disbar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire
2011 Ohio 5578 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
1996 Ohio 123 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
660 N.E.2d 1147, 74 Ohio St. 3d 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-brown-ohio-1996.