Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brain

688 A.2d 688
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 30, 1996
DocketNo. 296, Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 688 A.2d 688 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brain, 688 A.2d 688 (Pa. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 1996, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disability by Attorney that the respondent-attorney is suffering from disability by reason of physical disability which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to a complaint of professional misconduct brought against him in connection with Office of Disciplinary Counsel file No. 137 DB 96, it is hereby

ORDERED that Cyril D. Brain is immediately transferred to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E. for an indefinite period and until further Order of this Court. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent-attorney shall be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of [689]*689testimony and any further proceedings necessary pursuant to Rule 301, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
688 A.2d 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-brain-pa-1996.