Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bradley

695 N.E.2d 248, 82 Ohio St. 3d 261, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1698
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 24, 1998·No. No. 98-400·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the finding, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bradley, 695 N.E.2d 248, 82 Ohio St. 3d 261, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1698 (Ohio 1998).

695 N.E.2d 248 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lorain County Bar Association v. Williamson
2017 Ohio 6963 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2017)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Furth
2001 Ohio 1308 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furth
754 N.E.2d 219 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bradley
1999 Ohio 28 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Bradley
1998 Ohio 236 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)