Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton
570 N.E.2d 1100, 59 Ohio St. 3d 102, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 944
Opinion
We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton, 570 N.E.2d 1100, 59 Ohio St. 3d 102, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 944 (Ohio 1991).
570 N.E.2d 1100 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thottam v. Thottam, Unpublished Decision (6-1-1998)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998
Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Speros
1995 Ohio 205 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Speros
652 N.E.2d 681 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)