Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton

570 N.E.2d 1100, 59 Ohio St. 3d 102, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 944
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 1991·No. No. 90-1706·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton, 570 N.E.2d 1100, 59 Ohio St. 3d 102, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 944 (Ohio 1991).

570 N.E.2d 1100 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Speros
1995 Ohio 205 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Speros
652 N.E.2d 681 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)