Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton
570 N.E.2d 1100, 59 Ohio St. 3d 102, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 944
This text of 570 N.E.2d 1100 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boughton, 570 N.E.2d 1100, 59 Ohio St. 3d 102, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 944 (Ohio 1991).
Opinion
We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thottam v. Thottam, Unpublished Decision (6-1-1998)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998
Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Speros
1995 Ohio 205 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Speros
652 N.E.2d 681 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
570 N.E.2d 1100, 59 Ohio St. 3d 102, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-boughton-ohio-1991.