Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher

681 N.E.2d 1335, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1223

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 Ohio St. 3d 509 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 9, 1997·No. No. 95-2554·Published

Opinion

[1224] IT IS ORDERED by this court that Michael R. Booher, a.k.a. Michael Robert Booher, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 509, 664 N.E.2d 522.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1224] IT IS ORDERED by this court that Michael R. Booher, a.k.a. Michael Robert Booher, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 509, 664 N.E.2d 522.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher, 681 N.E.2d 1335, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1223 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

681 N.E.2d 1335 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Booher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related