Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bonavita

889 A.2d 1163, 585 Pa. 648, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3265
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 16, 2005
DocketNo. 973 DISC. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 889 A.2d 1163 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bonavita) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bonavita, 889 A.2d 1163, 585 Pa. 648, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3265 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2005, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated October 11, 2005, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant to Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it is

ORDERED that Thomas James Bonavi-ta is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years retroactive to December 17, 2004, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

[1164]*1164It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 A.2d 1163, 585 Pa. 648, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-bonavita-pa-2005.