Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bolden

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bolden

872 A.2d 826

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 19, 2005

DocketNo. 1002 Disciplinary Docket; No. 3—Supreme Court

StatusPublished

This text of 872 A.2d 826 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bolden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bolden, 872 A.2d 826 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated January 25, 2005, it is hereby

ORDERED that JAMES A. BOLDEN be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated January 25, 2005, it is hereby

ORDERED that JAMES A. BOLDEN be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

872 A.2d 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-bolden-pa-2005.