Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom

966 A.2d 568

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 23, 2009·No. No. 1409 Disciplinary Docket No. 3; No. 177 DB 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 14, 2008, and following-oral argument, it is hereby

ORDERED that Arthur Louis Bloom be and he is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BAER did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 14, 2008, and following-oral argument, it is hereby

ORDERED that Arthur Louis Bloom be and he is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BAER did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom, 966 A.2d 568 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

966 A.2d 568 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.