Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom

966 A.2d 568

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 23, 2009

DocketNo. 1409 Disciplinary Docket No. 3; No. 177 DB 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 966 A.2d 568 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom, 966 A.2d 568 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 14, 2008, and following-oral argument, it is hereby

ORDERED that Arthur Louis Bloom be and he is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BAER did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 14, 2008, and following-oral argument, it is hereby

ORDERED that Arthur Louis Bloom be and he is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BAER did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

966 A.2d 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-bloom-pa-2009.