Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Blatt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Blatt

901 A.2d 493

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 17, 2006

DocketNo. 1058 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 901 A.2d 493 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Blatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Blatt, 901 A.2d 493 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2006, on certification by the Disciplinary Board that the respondent, TIMOTHY JOHN BLATT, who was suspended on consent by Order of this Court dated September 8, 2005, for a period of six months, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment, TIMOTHY JOHN BLATT is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2006, on certification by the Disciplinary Board that the respondent, TIMOTHY JOHN BLATT, who was suspended on consent by Order of this Court dated September 8, 2005, for a period of six months, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment, TIMOTHY JOHN BLATT is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

901 A.2d 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-blatt-pa-2006.