Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

520 N.E.2d 221, 35 Ohio St. 3d 264, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 60
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 16, 1988
DocketD.D. No. 87-1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 520 N.E.2d 221 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica, 520 N.E.2d 221, 35 Ohio St. 3d 264, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 60 (Ohio 1988).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, we adopt both the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Wright, JJ., concur. [266]*266Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica
579 N.E.2d 712 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1991)
In re Corrigan
546 N.E.2d 1315 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Gill
528 N.E.2d 945 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 N.E.2d 221, 35 Ohio St. 3d 264, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-bica-ohio-1988.