Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica

520 N.E.2d 221, 35 Ohio St. 3d 264, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 60
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 16, 1988·No. D.D. No. 87-1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, we adopt both the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Wright, JJ., concur. [266] Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica, 520 N.E.2d 221, 35 Ohio St. 3d 264, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 60 (Ohio 1988).

520 N.E.2d 221 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bica
579 N.E.2d 712 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1991)
In re Corrigan
546 N.E.2d 1315 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Gill
528 N.E.2d 945 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)