Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bernosky
This text of 724 A.2d 929 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bernosky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 1999, an Order and Rule to Show Cause having been entered by this Court on February 5, 1999, and no response having been filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Rule is made absolute and respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;
2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.;
3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, in accordance with Rule 217(g), Pa.R.D.E., shall take such further action and make such further orders as may be necessary to fully protect the rights and interests of respondent’s clients; and
4. All financial institutions in which respondent holds fiduciary funds shall freeze such accounts pending further order of court.
[930]*930This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
724 A.2d 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-bernosky-pa-1999.