Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Berenholz

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Berenholz

884 A.2d 844
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 26, 2005
DocketNo. 1061 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 884 A.2d 844 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Berenholz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Berenholz, 884 A.2d 844 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2005, upon consideration of the contention of respondent-attorney that he is suffering from a disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to disciplinary charges brought against him in connection with Board File No. C2-05-318, it is

ORDERED that Joseph Berenholz is immediately transferred to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E., for an indefinite period and until further Order of the Court, and he shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent-attorney shall meanwhile be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 A.2d 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-berenholz-pa-2005.