Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Beane

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Beane

650 N.E.2d 1356, 72 Ohio St. 3d 480

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 12, 1995·No. No. 95-395·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record in this cause, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months, and he is afforded no credit for time served under prior suspensions. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record in this cause, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months, and he is afforded no credit for time served under prior suspensions. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Beane, 650 N.E.2d 1356, 72 Ohio St. 3d 480 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

650 N.E.2d 1356 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Beane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related