Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Barrish

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Barrish

896 A.2d 1162

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 15, 2006·No. No. 1103 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated December 6, 2005, the Petition for Review and response thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that Daniel C. Barrish be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of five years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter. Justice CASTILLE dissents and would disbar respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated December 6, 2005, the Petition for Review and response thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that Daniel C. Barrish be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of five years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter. Justice CASTILLE dissents and would disbar respondent.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Barrish, 896 A.2d 1162 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

896 A.2d 1162 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Barrish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.