Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baron

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baron

632 A.2d 306, 534 Pa. 272, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 219

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 13, 1993

DocketNo. 943 Disciplinary Docket No. 2; Disciplinary Board No. 35 DB 91

StatusPublished

This text of 632 A.2d 306 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baron, 632 A.2d 306, 534 Pa. 272, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 219 (Pa. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 1993, a Rule having been entered upon respondent by this Court on June 30, 1993, to show cause why he should not be disbarred and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, Bruce G. Baron is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

ZAPPALA, CAPPY and MONTEMURO, JJ., dissent and would accept the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of a five-year suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 1993, a Rule having been entered upon respondent by this Court on June 30, 1993, to show cause why he should not be disbarred and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, Bruce G. Baron is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

ZAPPALA, CAPPY and MONTEMURO, JJ., dissent and would accept the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of a five-year suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

632 A.2d 306, 534 Pa. 272, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-baron-pa-1993.