Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Barnett

830 A.2d 951
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 29, 2003
DocketNo. 854 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 830 A.2d 951 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Barnett, 830 A.2d 951 (Pa. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disability by Attorney that the respondent-attorney is suffering from a disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to disciplinary charges brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board File No. C2-03-185, it is hereby

ORDERED that Peter P. Barnett is transferred to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E. Said transfer is effective immediately. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings shall meanwhile be held in abeyance except for the perpetuation of testimony and the preservation of documentary evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
830 A.2d 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-barnett-pa-2003.