Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin

660 N.E.2d 1145, 74 Ohio St. 3d 592
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 1996·No. No. 95-2529·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin, 660 N.E.2d 1145, 74 Ohio St. 3d 592 (Ohio 1996).

660 N.E.2d 1145 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw
2010 Ohio 4412 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Corbin
109 Ohio St. 3d 241 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Medina County Bar Ass'n v. Carlson
100 Ohio St. 3d 134 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
People v. Mason
938 P.2d 133 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1997)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin
1996 Ohio 246 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)