Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin

660 N.E.2d 1145, 74 Ohio St. 3d 592
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2529
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 660 N.E.2d 1145 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin, 660 N.E.2d 1145, 74 Ohio St. 3d 592 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw
2010 Ohio 4412 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Corbin
109 Ohio St. 3d 241 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Medina County Bar Ass'n v. Carlson
100 Ohio St. 3d 134 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
People v. Mason
938 P.2d 133 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1997)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin
1996 Ohio 246 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
660 N.E.2d 1145, 74 Ohio St. 3d 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-baldwin-ohio-1996.