Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baillie
This text of 841 A.2d 1029 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baillie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2003, an Order and Rule to Show Cause having been entered by this Court on November 18, 2003, and no response to the Rule to Show Cause having been filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Rule is made absolute and, pursuant to Rule 208(f), Pa.R.D.E., respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;
2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.;
3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, in accordance with Rule 217(g), Pa. R.D.E., shall take such further action and make such further orders as may appear necessary to protect the rights and interests of respondent’s clients; and
4. All financial institutions in Pennsylvania in which respondent holds fiduciary funds shall freeze such accounts pending further order of this Court.
This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, PaR.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
841 A.2d 1029, 576 Pa. 693, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 2632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-baillie-pa-2003.