Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Badalian

553 N.E.2d 1080, 51 Ohio St. 3d 42, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 202
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 9, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2211
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 553 N.E.2d 1080 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Badalian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Badalian, 553 N.E.2d 1080, 51 Ohio St. 3d 42, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 202 (Ohio 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board. However, we agree with the recommendation of the panel. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Peterson v. Miday
2020 Ohio 5515 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State ex rel. Cornely v. McCall
2020 Ohio 4384 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 N.E.2d 1080, 51 Ohio St. 3d 42, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-badalian-ohio-1990.