Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 14, 2010·No. 26517·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court 26517 14-OCT-2010 11:56 AM

NO. 26517

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

RONALD G.S. AU, Respondent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

IN RE APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF RONALD G.S. AU, Applicant.

(ODC 95-242-4701, 97-213-5407, 98-064-555)

ORDER

(By: Nakayama, J. for the court1)

Upon review of Petitioner Ronald G.S. Au’s motion for leave to file a reply brief exceeding 10 pages and his request to file a reply brief of 20 pages, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted.

Petitioner Au may file a reply brief that does not exceed 20 pages, exclusive of indexes, appendices, and statements of related cases.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 14, 2010.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Associate Justice

1 Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, J., Circuit Judge Crandall in place of Acoba, J., recused, Circuit Judge Trader in place of Duffy, J., recused, and Circuit Judge McKenna, assigned by reason of vacancy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au, (haw 2010).

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Au) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.