Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Arcuri

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Arcuri

896 A.2d 1166

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 7, 2006

DocketNo. 1131 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 896 A.2d 1166 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Arcuri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Arcuri, 896 A.2d 1166 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2006, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated February 13, 2006, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant to Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it is

[1167]*1167ORDERED that FRANK C. ARCURI is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2006, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated February 13, 2006, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant to Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it is

[1167]*1167ORDERED that FRANK C. ARCURI is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

896 A.2d 1166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-arcuri-pa-2006.