Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Aliano

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Aliano

889 A.2d 1160, 585 Pa. 642, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3261

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 1, 2005

DocketNo. 1067 DISC. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 889 A.2d 1160 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Aliano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Aliano, 889 A.2d 1160, 585 Pa. 642, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3261 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated August 31, 2005, the Petition for Review and response thereto, the request for oral argument is denied pursuant to Rule 208(e)(4), Pa.R.D.E., and it is hereby

ORDERED that CHARLES J. ALI-ANO be subjected to PUBLIC CENSURE by the Supreme Court.

It is further ORDERED that the expenses incurred in the investigation and [1161]*1161prosecution of this matter shall be paid by the Respondent.

Mr. Justice Saylor dissents in favor of a private reprimand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI