Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Al-Rashid

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Al-Rashid

675 A.2d 1207

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 6, 1996

DocketNo. 44, Disciplinary Docket; No. 3—Supreme Court; Nos. 75 DB 94 and 7 DB 95 Disciplinary Board

StatusPublished

This text of 675 A.2d 1207 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Al-Rashid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Al-Rashid, 675 A.2d 1207 (Pa. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 1996, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated March 22,1996, it is hereby

ORDERED that NAJMA AL-RASHID be and she is DISBARRED from the Bar of this Commonwealth, and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 1996, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated March 22,1996, it is hereby

ORDERED that NAJMA AL-RASHID be and she is DISBARRED from the Bar of this Commonwealth, and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

675 A.2d 1207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-al-rashid-pa-1996.