Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Aguilar

Hawaii Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Aguilar

DecidedMarch 18, 2011

DocketSCAD-10-0000194

StatusPublished

This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Aguilar (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Aguilar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Aguilar, (haw 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-10-0000194 18-MAR-2011 10:47 AM SCAD-10-0000194

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

DANILO T. AGUILAR, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ODC 10-070-8904)

ORDER OF DISBARMENT

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba and Duffy, JJ.,

and Intermediate Court of Appeals Chief Judge Nakamura,

assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s Petition for Issuance of Reciprocal Discipline Notice, our December 22, 2010 Notice and Order, Respondent Danilo T. Aguilar’s lack of response to the notice and order, and the record, it appears Respondent Aguilar was disbarred by the United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i on November 24, 2010 after conviction upon 2 counts of money laundering. It further appears Respondent Aguilar was summarily suspended from practice by the Supreme Court of Guam on September 10, 2010. It further appears that Respondent Aguilar does not maintain a practice in this jurisdiction and delaying the effective date of this order for thirty days, as provided by Rule 2.16(c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH), would serve no purpose. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Danilo T. Aguilar

is disbarred, effective upon entry of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in addition to any other requirements for reinstatement imposed by the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i, Respondent Aguilar shall pay all costs of these proceedings as approved upon timely submission of a bill of costs. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Respondent Aguilar shall,

within ten (10) days after the date of this order, file with this

court an affidavit in full compliance with RSCH Rule 2.16(d).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 18, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Craig H. Nakamura

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-10-0000194 18-MAR-2011 10:47 AM SCAD-10-0000194

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

DANILO T. AGUILAR, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ODC 10-070-8904)

ORDER OF DISBARMENT

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba and Duffy, JJ.,

and Intermediate Court of Appeals Chief Judge Nakamura,

assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s Petition for Issuance of Reciprocal Discipline Notice, our December 22, 2010 Notice and Order, Respondent Danilo T. Aguilar’s lack of response to the notice and order, and the record, it appears Respondent Aguilar was disbarred by the United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i on November 24, 2010 after conviction upon 2 counts of money laundering. It further appears Respondent Aguilar was summarily suspended from practice by the Supreme Court of Guam on September 10, 2010. It further appears that Respondent Aguilar does not maintain a practice in this jurisdiction and delaying the effective date of this order for thirty days, as provided by Rule 2.16(c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH), would serve no purpose. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Danilo T. Aguilar

is disbarred, effective upon entry of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in addition to any other requirements for reinstatement imposed by the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i, Respondent Aguilar shall pay all costs of these proceedings as approved upon timely submission of a bill of costs. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Respondent Aguilar shall,

within ten (10) days after the date of this order, file with this

court an affidavit in full compliance with RSCH Rule 2.16(d).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 18, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Craig H. Nakamura

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Aguilar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-aguilar-haw-2011.