Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Acker

583 N.E.2d 1305, 62 Ohio St. 3d 415, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 134
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 5, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1490
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 583 N.E.2d 1305 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Acker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Acker, 583 N.E.2d 1305, 62 Ohio St. 3d 415, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 134 (Ohio 1992).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent’s resignation was disciplinary in nature. We hereby indefinitely suspend respondent from December 11, 1990, until he is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Maine. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Ngobeni
901 N.E.2d 113 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
583 N.E.2d 1305, 62 Ohio St. 3d 415, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-acker-ohio-1992.