Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Abookire

588 N.E.2d 793, 63 Ohio St. 3d 391, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 632
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1992
DocketNo. 91-2520
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 588 N.E.2d 793 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Abookire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Abookire, 588 N.E.2d 793, 63 Ohio St. 3d 391, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 632 (Ohio 1992).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

After a thorough review of the record, we agree with the board as to its findings of fact and conclusions of law, but disagree as to the sanction. Accordingly, we hereby suspend Charles A. Abookire, Jr. from the practice of law for one year without credit for time served and tax costs to him.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Abookire
1997 Ohio 103 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Abookire
686 N.E.2d 1371 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
588 N.E.2d 793, 63 Ohio St. 3d 391, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-abookire-ohio-1992.