Office of Administration v. State Employees' Retirement Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Administration v. State Employees' Retirement Board

163 A.3d 395, 2016 WL 7011702, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1698

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 3, 2016·No. 76 MAL 2016 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by Petitioners, is as follows:

Did [the] Commonwealth Court erroneously affirm the decision of the State Employees’ Retirement Board that union stipends, paid to union officers to-work exclusively for the union, are retirement-covered compensation, when that decision was clearly contrary to the mandates of the State Employees’ Retirement Code and inconsistent with decisions of this Honorable Court?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by Petitioners, is as follows:

Did [the] Commonwealth Court erroneously affirm the decision of the State Employees’ Retirement Board that union stipends, paid to union officers to-work exclusively for the union, are retirement-covered compensation, when that decision was clearly contrary to the mandates of the State Employees’ Retirement Code and inconsistent with decisions of this Honorable Court?

Office of Administration v. State Employees' Retirement Board, 163 A.3d 395, 2016 WL 7011702, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1698 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

163 A.3d 395 (Office of Administration v. State Employees' Retirement Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related