Office Depot v. Ortega

931 So. 2d 1051, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10850, 2006 WL 1735115
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 27, 2006·No. No. 1D04-5625·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Office Depot, the employer/carrier (E/ C), appeals a final workers’ compensation order directing it to pay claimant permanent total disability (PTD) benefits, together with supplemental benefits. Claimant, Anna Ortega, cross-appeals the denial of her claim for penalties, contending the judge of compensation claims (JCC) erred in finding the E/C timely filed its notice of denial within the statutory period provided in section 440.192(8), Florida Statutes. We summarily affirm the award of PTD benefits, concluding that the JCC’s findings were based on competent, substantial evidence, and his interpretation of the applicable statutes governing a determination of PTD was correct. As to his denial of the claim for penalties, it clearly appears from the record that the employer did not file its notice of denial within 14 days after its receipt of the petition for benefits, as required by section 440.192(8), and the denial is reversed. See also Kilbourne & Sons v. Kilbourne, 677 So.2d 855, 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ERVIN, PADOVANO, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office Depot v. Ortega, 931 So. 2d 1051, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10850, 2006 WL 1735115 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

931 So. 2d 1051 (Office Depot v. Ortega) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brandywine Convalescent v. Ragoobir
124 So. 3d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)