Offerman v. Offerman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Offerman v. Offerman

650 So. 2d 1139, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2387, 1995 WL 96590

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 10, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2192

StatusPublished

This text of 650 So. 2d 1139 (Offerman v. Offerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Offerman v. Offerman, 650 So. 2d 1139, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2387, 1995 WL 96590 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ann Marie Offerman (“the wife”) appeals from the order awarding temporary custody of her two minor children to Paul Offerman (“the husband”). She asserts that the trial court erred in conducting a hearing on the husband’s motion without giving her notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Shortly after the wife filed this appeal, she filed an emergency motion to stay the temporary custody order pending appellate review. This court granted the stay and remanded with instructions to return the children to the wife. See Offerman v. Offerman, 643 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). We have now completed our review and find that exigent [1140]*1140circumstances existed which justified the trial court’s action. See Dickman v. Dickman, 536 So.2d 1079, 1080 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). We therefore lift the stay and affirm the trial court.

AFFIRMED with instructions to return the children to the husband.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and DIAMANTES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ann Marie Offerman (“the wife”) appeals from the order awarding temporary custody of her two minor children to Paul Offerman (“the husband”). She asserts that the trial court erred in conducting a hearing on the husband’s motion without giving her notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Shortly after the wife filed this appeal, she filed an emergency motion to stay the temporary custody order pending appellate review. This court granted the stay and remanded with instructions to return the children to the wife. See Offerman v. Offerman, 643 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). We have now completed our review and find that exigent [1140]*1140circumstances existed which justified the trial court’s action. See Dickman v. Dickman, 536 So.2d 1079, 1080 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). We therefore lift the stay and affirm the trial court.

AFFIRMED with instructions to return the children to the husband.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and DIAMANTES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

650 So. 2d 1139, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2387, 1995 WL 96590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/offerman-v-offerman-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack